Tuesday, September 29, 2009

His ass . . .

. . . belongs in jail.

Question: If you drug, rape and sodomize a thirteen year-old girl, should you be able to avoid prosecution? Does it matter that you have been a fugitive for thirty years? Or that you're 76 years old? Or that the victim has forgiven you? Or that filmmakers and actors all over the world think it's unfair?

Since I have a daughter who was once thirteen, and several grand-daughters who eventually will be, I am totally, completely appalled about what I'm hearing:

Jack Lang, a former French culture minister, said that for Europeans the development showed that the American system of justice had run amok. “Sometimes, the American justice system shows an excess of formalism,” Mr. Lang said, “like an infernal machine that advances inexorably and blindly.”

Ronald Harwood, who won an Oscar as screenwriter of “The Pianist,” which Mr. Polanski directed, said: “It’s really disgraceful. Both the Americans and the Swiss have miscalculated.”

Nearly 100 entertainment industry professionals . . . urged in a petition that Mr. Polanski be released, saying: “Filmmakers in France, in Europe, in the United States and around the world are dismayed by this decision.”

Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, described Mr. Polanski’s arrest as “a bit sinister” and said he and the Polish foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, were jointly writing a letter expressing concern to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Polanski's agent, Jeff Berg, appearing Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show, said he did not understand why such a long-standing case was being pursued now.

Come on, folks. What if it was your daughter?

4 comments:

Punctuation said...

I had exactly this conversation with my poet friends yesterday in the pub (one of what is shaping up to be a series of "farewell to England" drinks).

It's as a simple as this: remove the name "Roman Polanski" and replace it with any made-up name, for example, "Dave Notexistski".

The newspaper headlines would say:

"Peodophile fugitive trapped by Swiss police after 30 years on the run".

There would be questions about how he evaded capture for so long and lots of back-slapping by police on finally getting their man. EVERYBODY would expect Dave Notexistski to get a fully-deserved long or even permanent stretch in prison and would be questioned at length about other possible crimes of a similar nature with much speculation in various newspapers about him being reponsible for virtually every unsolved sex-crime from here to Japan.

No-one would give a crap if he was mechanic, builder, engineer or the world's best car salesman.

He'd spend a good period of time in "protective custody" in prison away from other prisoners who were out to get him and he would be hurried in to variou court appearances with the crowd spitting at him as officers tried to shield him from the paparazzi.

Apparently the same thing does not apply if you work in the movies.

Jack said...

. . . and Woody Allen is standing up for him. How weird is that?

Punctuation said...

Truly predictable, although you think he'd keep his head down in these situations. People in glass houses and all that kind of thing...

Lisa said...

But he is such a talented director...

Seriously, I am so sick of people saying that it should be dropped. She was 13 and he raped her!