No, you wouldn't know him, but this man was my martial arts instructor for 20 years, and my friend for 35. I just learned from my daughter that he died from pancreatic cancer on 01 DEC 06. He was a bull of a man at 5-11 and 235, but one of the most gentle and friendly people I have ever had the distinct pleasure to meet.

Master Shin held a 9th dan in Taekwondo, an 8th dan in Judo and an 8th dan in Hapkido. I was Uke to his Tori in many demonstrations where he tossed me around like a rag doll, but he always let me down easy . . . well kind of easy.

I was a charter member and an instructor in his school in Omaha for 20 years. I watched his children grow up, and taught them myself. This master instructor, a Korean national champion, trusted at least some of the introduction of his children to HIS martial art to me. His daughter is now married, and a registered pharmacist. His son is now a 5th degree black belt, and outranks me - his old teacher.

Although martial arts, by their nature can be violent, violence did not define this man. While he could teach us to kill or maim with little effort, his prime directives were humility and respect.

It's funny, but the first thing I thought of when I heard of his death was not of him shattering concrete slabs with his bare hands, but of a brief moment when I introduced him to my father. As soon as "Mr. Shin, this is my father" left my lips, he bowed very deeply, then offered his hand and said "I'm honored to meet you Mr. --------."

Shortly after I attained Sam Dan (3rd degree black belt) Master Shin called me aside and gave me his old black belt, which is embroidered with "INSTRUCTOR SUK KI SHIN" on one end and "KOREA TAE KWON DO ASSOCIATION" over "KUK KI WON" on the other. I still have it, although I'm no longer training, and it hangs in a place of honor in my office at home.

Had I remained in Omaha, I would have studied with him to the end. Sadly, when I left Omaha, I could never find a teacher like Mr. Shin, and my formal instruction ended there. I sorely wish things had been different.

Ahnyong hee gaseyo, Shin kwan jang nim

Goodbye, my friend.

The 2007 bad English List - According to Reuters
(Somewhat modified, and with my annotations – jc)

A perfect storm: Numbingly applied to virtually any notable coincidence.

Webinar: Combines Web and Seminar. Belongs in the same school of non-thought that brought us e-anything and I-anything.

“X” is the new “Y”: Applied to everything from age to sex. (Chocolate is not the new sex. If it is to you, please seek help . . . and keep away from my Ghiradelli – jc)

Organic: Sagged under the weight of overuse. Applied to everything from computer software to dog food. (In the Navy, it means “within the Fleet”, so we still use it - jc)

Pop: Decorators need a new word when offering to add a touch of color. (Many of their ideas – at least on HGTV don’t “pop.” Puke may be more apropos.)

Post 9/11 and surge: “Surge” is now used to explain the expansion of anything.

Give back: Gives rise to the notion that as one’s life progresses, one accumulates a deficit balance with society which must be neutralized by charitable works or financial outlays. (Commonly used by celebrities trying to atone for a DUI or some other transgression. BTW, note the questionable use of “which” in a discussion about bad English – jc)

Back in the day: Too often applied to recent trends rather than historical events. (Also used by too many folks who aren’t old enough to have a “back in the day.”)

Random, sweet: Meaningless teen-age babble. (Usually with sweet spelled as suhweeet. The number of e’s used is generally random – jc)

It is what it is: Of course it is. What else could it be?

Emotional: Used by reporters to describe almost any event.

Decimate: Used by reporters when they mean “annihilate” or destroy,” not the true word’s meaning of “to lose a fraction.” (one-tenth, to be exact – jc)

Throw under the bus: Sports announcers need stop using this when assigning blame to a player. (If they don’t, the announcers should be thrown under the bus – jc)

Wordsmith: Simply because writers prefer to be called writers, I guess.

____________________________

Some of my own:

Begs the question: Constantly used instead of “raises the question.” Unfortunately the incorrect usage has now become the most common.

A Very Special Episode: Used (over-used, actually) to describe ANY television program that includes some emotional issue. (See “emotional” above.)

On the Nines: Or on the twos, or on the fives, or on the whatever-channel-number the TV station tries to tie programming to times.

That’s so 10 minutes ago: I think Cher said it in “Clueless.” Anyone who still uses it is obviously defined by the movie title.

What part of "NO" don’t you understand?: Come on. That’s so 10 minutes ago.

TomKat, Benifer, etc.: Puhleeeze, Lord, deliver us from all of these cutesy celebrity married couple names. Please.

Porsh: It’s PORSH-UH, not PORSH, you blithering idiot. That’s the way Dr. Porsche’s family pronounces it, and if you don’t, you’re showing your abysmal lack of IQ. Sorry to be blunt, but that’s the way it is. If I’ve offended you, please change your pronunciation. Don’t blame me for your lack of intelligence.


Must see TV: There isn’t any. Quit saying it until you have some – or until Giada De Laurentiis starts a program called “Everyday Naked Italian.” That’s as close as you can come to Must see TV.

Mathematics and the real world.

The profession of engineering requres a fairly intimate knowledge of mathematics. Unfortunately, in everyday life, even the simplist axioms seem not to apply.

For those of you who don't understand ratios, a ratio is simply a measure of the proportion of one "thing" to another "thing," and is commonly expressed as two numbers separated by a colon. An automotive example is 4.11:1, or four-eleven to one. This describes a rear axle geared such that the engine rotates 4.11 times for each revolution of the rear axle.

Another example is 1:1, or one to one, which roughly describes the ratio of men to women in the world.

Where is all of this leading? It's leading to a 1:1 ratio that should exist, but seemingly does not.

Considering that everyone should have one, we should expect the ratio of assholes to people to approximate 1:1 - excluding, of course, the few unfortunate surgeries required in certain serious diseases.

Theory aside, casual observation seems to indicate that the ratio is much more than 1:1, with there being significantly more assholes than people.

As evidence, I present my 2004 Ford explorer, which was pretty much unblemished until sometime this week. In one trip around the vehicle, I found a huge dent in the rear hatch door, a 4" black mark along the passenger's door, and a large black scuff on the right corner of the front bumper.

So, restating my hypothesis, where:

A = Assholes
P = People

then,

A:P > 1

Q.E.D.

I came from humble beginnings.
This is the apartment complex where my parents lived when I was born.

. . .

and here's the house we moved into when I was about a year old. It needed a teeny bit of work.

I happened to start reading "The Afghan" by Frederick Forsyth today, and a couple of early passages caught my attention:

Fundamentalist' is a misnomer. The very word implies 'back to basics.' But the planters of bombs in trains, buses and malls are not going back to the basics of Islam. They are writing their own new script, then arguing retroactively, seeking to find Koranic passages that justify their war.

There are fundamentalists in all religions. Christian monks in a closed order, sworn to poverty, self-denial, chastity, obedience - these are fundamentalists. Ascetics exist in all religions, but they do not advocate indiscriminate mass murder of men, women and children. That is the key phrase. Judge all religions and all sects within those religions by that phrase and you will see that to wish to return to the basic teachings is not terrorism, for in no religion, including Islam, do the basic teachings advocate mass murder.'

Jihad' is the wrong word. Of course jihad exists, but it has rules. Either it is a personal struggle within oneself to become a better Muslim, but in that case it is completely nonaggressive. Or it means true holy war, armed struggle in defense of Islam. That's what the terrorists claim they are about. But they choose to airbrush the rules out of text.

For one thing, true jihad can only be declared by a legitimate Koranic authority of proven and accepted repute. Bin Laden and his acolytes are notorious for their lack of scholarship. Even if the West had indeed attached, hurt, damaged, humiliated and demeaned Islam, and thus all Muslims, there are still rules, and the Koran is absolutely specific on these.

"It is forbidden to attack and kill those who have offered no offense and have done nothing to hurt you. It is forbidden to kill women and children. It is forbidden to take hostages, and it is forbidden to mistreat, torture and kill prisoners. The AQ terrorists and their followers do all four on a daily basis."

I would call them 'the New Jihadis,' because they have invented an unholy war outside the laws of the holy Koran, and thus of true Islam. True jihad is not savage, but what they practice is.

All the bombers claim to be martyrs. How do they justify this? Badly. Because they have been duped, well educated though some of them are. It is perfectly feasible to die a shahid, or martyr. But again, there are rules and these are quite specific in the Koran. The warrior must not die by his own hand even though he has volunteered for a no-return mission. He must not know the time and place of his own death.

Suicides do exactly that. Yet suicide is specifically forbidden. In his lifetime, Muhammad absolutely refused to bless the body of a suicide even though the man had ended his own life to avoid the crippling agony of disease. Those who commit mass murder of innocents and commit suicide are destined for hell, not paradise. The false preachers and imams who trick them down this road will join them there.

I would like to see a major, respected imam - even one in the U.S.A. make a statement like this. However, most I see on television dodge like a ball player in a run-down between second and third.

Gentlemen, Imams and learned scholars. If you prefer not to have all Muslims branded by the same iron, grow a pair and get on the boat. It's leaving the pier.

A list of the states I have visited in the U.S. Boring? Maybe, but I have nothing else to post today.



create your own personalized map of the USA
or check out ourCalifornia travel guide

OK, I haven't posted lately . . . so sue me.

My main hobby is building hot rods. This is the one I'm working on now.

It's a 1934 Ford with a 430 HP small block Chevy motor, 700/R4 automatic transmission and a 9" Ford rear axle.

I'm still waiting on the DMV to process my application for title. I've been twiddling my thumbs for 43 days now.

My project for today was to install door safety locks. Since the doors hinge at the rear, a door opened while the car is moving would probably be ripped off and tossed in the ditch. The safety lock consists of a pin in the door which slides into a hole in the door jamb. Here's a picture of it. The item on the right is the locking mechanism. The item on the left is my foot after I knocked the mechanism off of the kitchen counter.